PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONL vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CONL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CONL

1D
-9.57%
1M
-21.27%
YTD
-56.79%
6M
-68.91%
1Y
-74.16%
3Y*
-11.06%
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
0.35%
1M
6.98%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CONL and NTSD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CONL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONL
CONL Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CONLNTSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.13

CONL vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CONLNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

5.75

-5.94

Drawdowns

CONL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -93.95%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CONLNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.95%

-5.20%

-88.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.57%

0.00%

-92.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.91%

-0.84%

-55.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.48%

Volatility

CONL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CONLNTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.87%

24.31%

+114.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

149.87%

24.31%

+125.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

149.87%

24.31%

+125.56%

CONL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CONL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CONL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CONL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

CONL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONL and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CONL and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer