CONI vs. QQQD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CONI (GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. CONI is actively managed, while QQQD is passively managed. Over the past year, CONI returned -17.01% vs -14.61% for QQQD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CONI charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.

Performance

CONI vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONI achieves a -18.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's 4.24% return.

CONI

• 1D: 7.89%
• 1M: 22.94%
• YTD: -18.05%
• 6M: -6.27%
• 1Y: -17.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQD

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 9.00%
• YTD: 4.24%
• 6M: 6.32%
• 1Y: -14.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONI vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF	-18.05%	-70.84%	-53.81%
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares	4.24%	-20.32%	-20.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CONI and QQQD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.52

The correlation between CONI and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CONI vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONI

CONI Risk / Return Rank: 11
CONI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CONI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CONI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
CONI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CONI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QQQD

QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 4
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONI vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CONI	QQQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	-0.71	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	-0.94	+1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.90	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	-0.64	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	-1.01	+0.59

CONI vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONI Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONI and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CONI vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONI drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONI and QQQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONI	QQQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.53%	-49.47%	-45.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.12%	-22.92%	-52.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.95%	-43.64%	-46.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.63%	-30.63%	-43.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.16%	14.98%	+29.18%

Volatility

CONI vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) has a higher volatility of 36.67% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.17%. This indicates that CONI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONI	QQQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.67%	7.17%	+29.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	110.98%	15.65%	+95.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	136.92%	20.89%	+116.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.41%	26.85%	+100.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.41%	26.85%	+100.56%

CONI vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONI has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONI vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

CONI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than QQQD's 3.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF	1.07%	0.87%	1.39%
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares	3.79%	4.33%	5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONI and QQQD in my portfolio?

CONI and QQQD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONI or QQQD?

CONI has higher volatility (36.67%) compared to QQQD (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONI dropped -94.53% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

Which ETF is better, CONI or QQQD?

On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -14.61% vs -17.01% for CONI. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CONI or QQQD?

Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -14.61% return vs -17.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONI or QQQD?

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONI or QQQD?

QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.07% for CONI.

What is the main difference between CONI and QQQD?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONI and 0.57% for QQQD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CONI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.