PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMT vs. ZSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COMT vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COMT vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
35.81%6.07%5.96%-7.90%
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
4.85%28.43%-14.39%-10.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 35.81% return, which is significantly higher than ZSC's 4.85% return.


COMT

1D
-1.46%
1M
20.45%
YTD
35.81%
6M
35.80%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
15.41%
10Y*
10.23%

ZSC

1D
0.44%
1M
1.03%
YTD
4.85%
6M
17.52%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COMT vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COMT vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSC
ZSC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMT vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMTZSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.27

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

2.95

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

4.05

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.53

12.11

-2.58

COMT vs. ZSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the ZSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMT and ZSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMTZSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.27

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.09

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between COMT and ZSC is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

COMT vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison

COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than ZSC's 1.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.70%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
1.67%1.75%2.18%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COMT vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than ZSC's maximum drawdown of -26.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and ZSC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COMTZSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.89%

-26.49%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-7.69%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-2.33%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.39%

-15.63%

-8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.57%

+1.59%

Volatility

COMT vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) at 3.98%. This indicates that COMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COMTZSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

3.98%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.20%

10.59%

+4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

13.56%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

12.42%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

12.42%

+6.26%