COMT vs. USOI
COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) and USOI (Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN) are both Commodities funds. COMT is actively managed, while USOI is passively managed. Over the past year, COMT returned 47.51% vs 49.69% for USOI. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COMT charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for USOI.
Performance
COMT vs. USOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly lower than USOI's 50.53% return.
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
USOI
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 50.53%
- 6M
- 48.65%
- 1Y
- 49.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT vs. USOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 0.09% |
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 50.53% | -8.78% | 6.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between COMT and USOI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between COMT and USOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COMT vs. USOI — Risk / Return Rank
COMT
USOI
COMT vs. USOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COMT | USOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 4.20 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.11 | 9.74 | +4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COMT | USOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.23 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.94 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
COMT vs. USOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than USOI's maximum drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and USOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMT | USOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.89% | -19.49% | -32.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -11.90% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -3.08% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -7.21% | -16.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 5.12% | -1.74% |
Volatility
COMT vs. USOI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) is 7.37%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that COMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COMT | USOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 10.14% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.80% | 18.25% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.29% | 22.35% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 22.59% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 22.59% | -3.70% |
COMT vs. USOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than USOI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
COMT vs. USOI - Dividend Comparison
COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than USOI's 36.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 36.88% | 27.21% | 12.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COMT and USOI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USOI has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to COMT (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMT dropped -51.89% vs USOI's -19.49%.
On 1-year performance, USOI leads with 49.69% vs 47.51% for COMT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USOI has performed better with a 49.69% return vs 47.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for USOI.
USOI has the higher dividend yield at 36.88%, compared with 5.54% for COMT.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for COMT and 0.85% for USOI.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COMT and USOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer