COMT vs. GLD
COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COMT returned 7.87%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for GLD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COMT charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
COMT vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 26.00% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, COMT has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 7.87%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.
COMT
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- YTD
- 26.00%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- 6M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
COMT vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 26.00% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 10.81% | -6.67% | 11.70% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -4.87% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between COMT and GLD is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014 | 0.19 |
The correlation between COMT and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COMT vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
COMT
GLD
COMT vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COMT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.89 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.78 | 2.19 | +3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COMT vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.89% | -45.56% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.57% | -26.21% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -26.21% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -26.21% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | -26.21% | -13.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.13% | -23.97% | +9.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.97% | -16.18% | -7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 10.56% | -5.51% |
Volatility
COMT vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) is 5.68%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that COMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COMT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 8.27% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.60% | 24.05% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.45% | 27.78% | -6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 18.34% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 16.08% | +2.76% |
COMT vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
COMT vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 6.14% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COMT and GLD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to COMT (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMT dropped -51.89% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 11.48% vs 7.87% for COMT. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 6.14%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
COMT is categorized as Commodities, while GLD is Gold. COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for COMT and 0.40% for GLD.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COMT and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer