COMB vs. BDRY
COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both Commodities funds. COMB is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COMB returned 11.27%/yr vs -11.69%/yr for BDRY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COMB charges 0.25%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
COMB vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMB achieves a 26.81% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 43.90% return.
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 43.90%
- 6M
- 35.70%
- 1Y
- 142.69%
- 3Y*
- 27.14%
- 5Y*
- -11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
COMB vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -10.48% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 43.90% | 44.24% | -47.40% | 25.79% | -68.84% | 282.99% | -50.16% | -15.92% | -27.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between COMB and BDRY is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COMB vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
COMB
BDRY
COMB vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COMB | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | 6.65 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 19.36 | -6.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COMB | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 3.40 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | -0.19 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.13 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
COMB vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMB drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMB and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMB | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -89.16% | +55.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -21.60% | +13.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.35% | -69.71% | +58.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -89.16% | +62.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -69.60% | +65.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -58.38% | +46.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 7.40% | -4.46% |
Volatility
COMB vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is 5.14%, while Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that COMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COMB | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 11.26% | -6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 30.02% | -15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 42.29% | -25.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 60.70% | -44.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 62.58% | -47.45% |
COMB vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
COMB vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COMB and BDRY have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDRY has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to COMB (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMB dropped -33.50% vs BDRY's -89.16%.
On 5-year performance, COMB leads with 11.27% vs -11.69% for BDRY. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, COMB has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMB has performed better with a 11.27% return vs -11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for COMB and 3.76% for BDRY.
BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COMB and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer