PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COM vs. SPXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COM vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -20.76% return.


COM

1D
-1.21%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
11.12%
6M
10.20%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*

SPXS

1D
3.42%
1M
3.11%
YTD
-20.76%
6M
-18.37%
1Y
-44.21%
3Y*
-40.67%
5Y*
-33.53%
10Y*
-42.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COM vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
11.12%7.72%5.81%-2.09%9.17%28.00%6.63%-0.18%-0.03%-1.97%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
-20.76%-41.53%-42.84%-45.97%36.14%-58.11%-70.47%-56.40%3.44%-33.86%

Correlation

The correlation between COM and SPXS is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2017

-0.15

The correlation between COM and SPXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to -0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COM vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS
SPXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COM vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COMSPXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.79

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

-0.94

+3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

-1.63

+10.60

COM vs. SPXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COM Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the SPXS Sharpe Ratio of -1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COM and SPXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COM vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and SPXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMSPXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-100.00%

+84.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-46.94%

+39.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

-84.13%

+75.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

-90.11%

+76.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.74%

-100.00%

+92.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-96.29%

+90.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

29.25%

-27.13%

Volatility

COM vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is 2.26%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that COM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMSPXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

14.08%

-11.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

29.38%

-20.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.59%

37.37%

-26.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.55%

50.68%

-41.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.77%

53.59%

-43.82%

COM vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

COM vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison

COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than SPXS's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.55%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
4.62%4.93%6.18%5.66%0.00%0.00%0.51%1.74%0.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COM and SPXS have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXS has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to COM (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COM dropped -15.95% vs SPXS's -100.00%.

On 5-year performance, COM leads with 7.89% vs -33.53% for SPXS. On fees, COM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, COM has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COM has performed better with a 7.89% return vs -33.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.

SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.55% for COM.

COM is categorized as Commodities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. COM tracks Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index, while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.70% for COM and 1.08% for SPXS.

COM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COM and SPXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer