COM vs. NVDU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COM is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index, while NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. COM is passively managed, while NVDU is actively managed. Over the past year, COM returned 22.41% vs 84.73% for NVDU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COM charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.

Performance

COM vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 19.93% return.

COM

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 14.96%
• 6M: 14.36%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 7.16%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: —

NVDU

• 1D: -7.30%
• 1M: 14.13%
• YTD: 19.93%
• 6M: 27.09%
• 1Y: 84.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COM vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF	14.96%	7.72%	5.81%	-6.93%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	19.93%	33.65%	289.29%	9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between COM and NVDU is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.07

Return for Risk

COM vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COM

COM Risk / Return Rank: 70
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

NVDU

NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 34
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 33
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COM vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COM	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.26	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	1.89	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.23	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	2.02	+2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	4.60	+9.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COM vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COM Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COM and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COM	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.26	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.14	-0.42

Drawdowns

COM vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum NVDU drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and NVDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	COM	NVDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.95%	-67.27%	+51.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.55%	-42.27%	+37.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.55%	-18.32%	+13.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-18.84%	+12.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	18.47%	-16.91%

Volatility

COM vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is 4.04%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 24.74%. This indicates that COM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COM	NVDU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	24.74%	-20.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.60%	50.50%	-41.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.41%	68.02%	-57.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.60%	91.06%	-81.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.77%	91.06%	-81.29%

COM vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

COM vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than NVDU's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF	2.46%	2.99%	3.88%	3.80%	8.59%	10.32%	0.13%	1.09%	2.36%	0.09%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	4.83%	5.68%	16.85%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COM and NVDU in my portfolio?

COM and NVDU have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COM or NVDU?

NVDU has higher volatility (24.74%) compared to COM (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COM dropped -15.95% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

Which ETF is better, COM or NVDU?

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 84.73% vs 22.41% for COM. On fees, COM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, COM has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COM or NVDU?

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 84.73% return vs 22.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COM or NVDU?

COM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for NVDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COM or NVDU?

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 2.46% for COM.

What is the main difference between COM and NVDU?

COM is categorized as Commodities, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for COM and 1.04% for NVDU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.