COM vs. BSMW
COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COM is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, COM returned 6.23%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. COM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
COM vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.44% return.
COM
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
BSMW
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 6.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COM vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 12.75% | 7.72% | 5.81% | -2.32% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.44% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between COM and BSMW is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between COM and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COM vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
COM
BSMW
COM vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COM | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.18 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 6.72 | +2.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COM vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COM | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -7.57% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -2.92% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.50% | -7.34% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.38% | -0.84% | -5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -1.71% | -4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 0.94% | +1.12% |
Volatility
COM vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.46%. This indicates that COM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COM | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.15% | 0.46% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 1.95% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 2.70% | +7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 4.97% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.76% | 4.97% | +4.79% |
COM vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
COM vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than BSMW's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.19% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.51% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COM and BSMW have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COM has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to BSMW (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COM dropped -15.95% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, COM leads with 6.23% vs 3.01% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COM has performed better with a 6.23% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for COM.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 2.51% for COM.
COM is categorized as Commodities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. COM tracks Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index, while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for COM and 0.18% for BSMW.
BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COM and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer