PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLO vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COLO vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLO achieves a 24.92% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.63% return.


COLO

1D
1.30%
1M
23.53%
YTD
24.92%
6M
24.58%
1Y
63.49%
3Y*
35.46%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
7.13%

SGOV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLO vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
24.92%68.88%4.68%24.92%-21.32%-11.50%49.28%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.63%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between COLO and SGOV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COLO vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLO
COLO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLO vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COLOSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-270.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

194.55

-193.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

396.11

-392.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

4,438.60

-4,428.89

COLO vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLO and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COLO vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLO drawdown since its inception was -78.91%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLO and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COLOSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.91%

-0.03%

-78.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.79%

-0.01%

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-0.01%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.86%

-0.03%

-43.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.20%

0.00%

-15.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-0.00%

-40.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

0.00%

+6.56%

Volatility

COLO vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that COLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COLOSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

0.05%

+11.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.36%

0.13%

+20.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.09%

0.19%

+22.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

0.24%

+23.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.47%

0.24%

+25.23%

COLO vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

COLO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

COLO vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

COLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
6.01%7.51%6.08%6.99%12.55%2.32%3.23%3.04%3.03%1.83%1.48%1.58%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COLO and SGOV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COLO has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLO dropped -78.91% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, COLO leads with 17.04% vs 3.56% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COLO has performed better with a 17.04% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.01%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.

COLO is categorized as Latin America Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for COLO and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.33 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COLO and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer