PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLO vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COLO vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLO achieves a 23.32% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 29.19% return. Over the past 10 years, COLO has underperformed REMX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.32% annualized return.


COLO

1D
2.47%
1M
22.56%
YTD
23.32%
6M
22.17%
1Y
61.24%
3Y*
35.23%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
7.08%

REMX

1D
2.73%
1M
-10.13%
YTD
29.19%
6M
34.20%
1Y
144.64%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLO vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
23.32%68.88%4.68%24.92%-21.32%-11.50%-14.60%30.42%-19.88%11.88%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
29.19%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between COLO and REMX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010

0.45

The correlation between COLO and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COLO vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COLO
REMX

Financial Services

39.3%

-

Basic Materials

18.4%
100.0%

Utilities

17.7%

-

Energy

17.3%

-

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Industrials

2.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

COLO
39.3%
REMX

-

Basic Materials

COLO
18.4%
REMX
100.0%

Utilities

COLO
17.7%
REMX

-

Energy

COLO
17.3%
REMX

-

Communication Services

COLO
3.4%
REMX

-

Industrials

COLO
2.4%
REMX

-

Consumer Cyclical

COLO
1.5%
REMX

-

Consumer Defensive

COLO

-

REMX

-

Healthcare

COLO

-

REMX

-

Real Estate

COLO

-

REMX

-

Technology

COLO

-

REMX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COLO vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLO
COLO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLO vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COLOREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

6.23

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

16.82

-7.46

COLO vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLO and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COLO vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLO drawdown since its inception was -78.91%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLO and REMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COLOREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.91%

-90.20%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.79%

-23.35%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-62.11%

+43.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.86%

-73.34%

+29.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.75%

-73.34%

+10.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.29%

-56.27%

+39.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-66.84%

+26.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

8.63%

-2.07%

Volatility

COLO vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) is 11.56%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that COLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COLOREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.56%

17.56%

-6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

37.14%

-16.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

49.74%

-26.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

40.64%

-17.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.47%

37.14%

-11.67%

COLO vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COLO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

COLO vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

COLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than REMX's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
6.09%7.51%6.08%6.99%12.55%2.32%3.23%3.04%3.03%1.83%1.48%1.58%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.36%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


COLO and REMX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to COLO (11.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLO dropped -78.91% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 10-year performance, REMX leads with 10.32% vs 7.08% for COLO. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, COLO has been the lower-risk option at 11.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REMX has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 1.36% for REMX.

COLO is categorized as Latin America Equities, while REMX is Materials. COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for COLO and 0.59% for REMX.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COLO and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer