PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a DKK 10,000 investment in Coloplast A/S (COLO-B.CO) and Novozymes AS (NVZMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COLO-B.CO is traded in DKK, while NVZMY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVZMY values have been converted to DKK using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLO-B.CO achieves a -28.89% return, which is significantly lower than NVZMY's -8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, COLO-B.CO has underperformed NVZMY with an annualized return of 0.12%, while NVZMY has yielded a comparatively higher 2.95% annualized return.


COLO-B.CO

1D
1.21%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
-28.89%
6M
-33.14%
1Y
-36.22%
3Y*
-21.69%
5Y*
-14.79%
10Y*
0.12%

NVZMY

1D
0.11%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
-8.37%
6M
-7.76%
1Y
-20.21%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-2.36%
10Y*
2.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COLO-B.CO
Coloplast A/S
-28.89%-27.73%4.47%-2.40%-27.80%26.10%14.67%39.66%25.89%6.74%
NVZMY
Novozymes AS
-8.37%0.90%10.88%9.33%-34.62%57.70%7.94%12.86%-17.00%48.90%

Correlation

The correlation between COLO-B.CO and NVZMY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.30

The correlation between COLO-B.CO and NVZMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLO-B.CO
COLO-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COLO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NVZMY
NVZMY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NVZMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVZMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVZMY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NVZMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVZMY Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coloplast A/S (COLO-B.CO) and Novozymes AS (NVZMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLO-B.CONVZMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

0.87

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.69

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.00

-1.15

-0.85

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the NVZMY Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLO-B.CO and NVZMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COLO-B.CONVZMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.43

-0.84

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

-0.09

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

0.11

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.05

+0.55

Drawdowns

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLO-B.CO drawdown since its inception was -63.31%, smaller than the maximum NVZMY drawdown of -83.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLO-B.CO and NVZMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COLO-B.CONVZMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.31%

-83.94%

+20.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.33%

-29.56%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.16%

-29.56%

-28.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.31%

-47.59%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.31%

-47.59%

-15.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.76%

-51.60%

-11.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.43%

-51.40%

+38.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.17%

17.63%

+0.54%

Volatility

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Volatility Comparison

Coloplast A/S (COLO-B.CO) and Novozymes AS (NVZMY) have volatilities of 7.19% and 6.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COLO-B.CONVZMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

6.93%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

17.03%

+3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.66%

24.02%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.29%

26.15%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

25.92%

-1.00%

Dividends

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Dividend Comparison

COLO-B.CO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than NVZMY's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLO-B.CO
Coloplast A/S
5.99%4.21%2.80%2.72%2.46%1.65%1.94%2.06%2.64%3.04%2.83%2.24%
NVZMY
Novozymes AS
1.81%1.51%1.03%2.68%1.68%0.69%0.91%1.03%1.10%1.64%0.95%0.60%

Financials

COLO-B.CO vs. NVZMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coloplast A/S and Novozymes AS. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. COLO-B.CO values in DKK, NVZMY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


COLO-B.CO and NVZMY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COLO-B.CO and NVZMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer