PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a DKK 10,000 investment in Coloplast A/S (COLO-B.CO) and Ambu A/S (AMBU-B.CO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLO-B.CO achieves a -28.89% return, which is significantly lower than AMBU-B.CO's -25.00% return. Over the past 10 years, COLO-B.CO has underperformed AMBU-B.CO with an annualized return of 0.12%, while AMBU-B.CO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.45% annualized return.


COLO-B.CO

1D
1.21%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
-28.89%
6M
-33.14%
1Y
-36.22%
3Y*
-21.69%
5Y*
-14.79%
10Y*
0.12%

AMBU-B.CO

1D
3.21%
1M
5.77%
YTD
-25.00%
6M
-24.36%
1Y
-33.29%
3Y*
-15.50%
5Y*
-21.97%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COLO-B.CO
Coloplast A/S
-28.89%-27.73%4.47%-2.40%-27.80%26.10%14.67%39.66%25.89%6.74%
AMBU-B.CO
Ambu A/S
-25.00%-14.98%-0.80%18.20%-48.55%-34.16%135.96%-28.42%41.19%96.82%

Correlation

The correlation between COLO-B.CO and AMBU-B.CO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 1993

0.20

Over the past year, COLO-B.CO and AMBU-B.CO have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Coloplast A/S

Ambu A/S

Return for Risk

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLO-B.CO
COLO-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COLO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLO-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AMBU-B.CO
AMBU-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AMBU-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBU-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBU-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBU-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBU-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coloplast A/S (COLO-B.CO) and Ambu A/S (AMBU-B.CO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLO-B.COAMBU-B.CODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

0.83

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.79

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.00

-1.52

-0.48

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the AMBU-B.CO Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLO-B.CO and AMBU-B.CO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COLO-B.COAMBU-B.CODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.43

-0.96

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

-0.48

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

0.05

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.10

Drawdowns

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLO-B.CO drawdown since its inception was -63.31%, smaller than the maximum AMBU-B.CO drawdown of -82.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLO-B.CO and AMBU-B.CO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COLO-B.COAMBU-B.CODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.31%

-82.59%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.33%

-42.44%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.16%

-59.36%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.31%

-74.40%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.31%

-82.59%

+19.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.76%

-81.25%

+18.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.43%

-33.32%

+20.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.17%

22.01%

-3.84%

Volatility

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coloplast A/S (COLO-B.CO) is 7.19%, while Ambu A/S (AMBU-B.CO) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that COLO-B.CO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBU-B.CO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COLO-B.COAMBU-B.CODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

8.64%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

22.97%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.66%

35.09%

-9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.29%

46.44%

-20.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

50.19%

-25.27%

Dividends

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Dividend Comparison

COLO-B.CO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than AMBU-B.CO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBU-B.CO
Ambu A/S
0.62%0.47%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.11%0.34%0.26%0.33%0.55%0.45%
COLO-B.CO
Coloplast A/S
5.99%4.21%2.80%2.72%2.46%1.65%1.94%2.06%2.64%3.04%2.83%2.24%

Financials

COLO-B.CO vs. AMBU-B.CO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coloplast A/S and Ambu A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in DKK except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


COLO-B.CO and AMBU-B.CO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COLO-B.CO and AMBU-B.CO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer