PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COL.MC vs. DG.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Inmobiliaria Colonial SA (COL.MC) and VINCI SA (DG.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COL.MC achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than DG.PA's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, COL.MC has underperformed DG.PA with an annualized return of -0.47%, while DG.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.


COL.MC

1D
-1.94%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.65%
6M
6.32%
1Y
-5.05%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
-7.04%
10Y*
-0.47%

DG.PA

1D
0.32%
1M
-7.45%
YTD
5.98%
6M
5.49%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COL.MC
Inmobiliaria Colonial SA
1.65%9.93%-17.92%12.15%-26.50%5.37%-28.97%41.46%-0.24%28.07%
DG.PA
VINCI SA
5.98%25.31%-8.64%26.50%3.96%17.59%-15.20%41.57%-12.79%35.21%

Correlation

The correlation between COL.MC and DG.PA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2002

0.29

The correlation between COL.MC and DG.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COL.MC vs. DG.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COL.MC
COL.MC Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
COL.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COL.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
COL.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
COL.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
COL.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DG.PA
DG.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DG.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DG.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DG.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DG.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DG.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inmobiliaria Colonial SA (COL.MC) and VINCI SA (DG.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COL.MCDG.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.03

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

0.07

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

0.12

-0.55

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COL.MC Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the DG.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COL.MC and DG.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COL.MCDG.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

0.04

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.45

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.38

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.40

-0.60

Drawdowns

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COL.MC drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than DG.PA's maximum drawdown of -67.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COL.MC and DG.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COL.MCDG.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.88%

-67.98%

-31.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

-12.93%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.37%

-15.85%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.54%

-20.34%

-30.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.18%

-46.60%

-16.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.50%

-10.63%

-88.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-16.36%

-65.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.77%

7.10%

+3.67%

Volatility

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Volatility Comparison

Inmobiliaria Colonial SA (COL.MC) and VINCI SA (DG.PA) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COL.MCDG.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

6.09%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.71%

18.80%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.19%

23.40%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.85%

21.54%

+4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.58%

25.70%

+1.88%

Dividends

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Dividend Comparison

COL.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than DG.PA's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COL.MC
Inmobiliaria Colonial SA
4.37%4.45%4.39%2.44%0.88%2.67%0.55%1.12%1.79%1.61%1.85%0.00%
DG.PA
VINCI SA
4.05%3.96%4.51%3.56%3.48%2.90%3.07%2.74%3.49%2.54%2.94%3.03%

Financials

COL.MC vs. DG.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inmobiliaria Colonial SA and VINCI SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


COL.MC and DG.PA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COL.MC and DG.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer