PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COL.MC vs. AAL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Inmobiliaria Colonial SA (COL.MC) and Anglo American plc (AAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COL.MC is traded in EUR, while AAL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AAL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COL.MC achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than AAL.L's 33.47% return. Over the past 10 years, COL.MC has underperformed AAL.L with an annualized return of -0.47%, while AAL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.19% annualized return.


COL.MC

1D
-1.94%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.65%
6M
6.32%
1Y
-5.05%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
-7.04%
10Y*
-0.47%

AAL.L

1D
-1.05%
1M
6.13%
YTD
33.47%
6M
38.23%
1Y
73.88%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
24.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COL.MC
Inmobiliaria Colonial SA
1.65%9.93%-17.92%12.15%-26.50%5.37%-28.97%41.46%-0.24%28.07%
AAL.L
Anglo American plc
33.47%27.22%30.46%-34.48%10.67%45.27%10.05%39.93%17.62%32.67%

Correlation

The correlation between COL.MC and AAL.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COL.MC vs. AAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COL.MC
COL.MC Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
COL.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COL.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
COL.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
COL.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
COL.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

AAL.L
AAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inmobiliaria Colonial SA (COL.MC) and Anglo American plc (AAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COL.MCAAL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.34

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

3.18

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

10.53

-10.96

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COL.MC Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the AAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COL.MC and AAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COL.MCAAL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

2.08

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.25

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.59

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.10

-0.30

Drawdowns

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COL.MC drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than AAL.L's maximum drawdown of -92.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COL.MC and AAL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COL.MCAAL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.88%

-92.86%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

-24.53%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.37%

-34.29%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.54%

-57.63%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.18%

-57.63%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.50%

-3.92%

-95.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-43.42%

-38.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.77%

7.08%

+3.69%

Volatility

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inmobiliaria Colonial SA (COL.MC) is 6.11%, while Anglo American plc (AAL.L) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that COL.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COL.MCAAL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

13.71%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.71%

29.83%

-15.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.19%

37.52%

-18.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.85%

40.90%

-15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.58%

41.03%

-13.45%

Dividends

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Dividend Comparison

COL.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than AAL.L's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAL.L
Anglo American plc
0.42%0.78%3.17%6.04%8.43%8.95%2.83%4.82%5.08%2.76%0.00%22.15%
COL.MC
Inmobiliaria Colonial SA
4.37%4.45%4.39%2.44%0.88%2.67%0.55%1.12%1.79%1.61%1.85%0.00%

Financials

COL.MC vs. AAL.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inmobiliaria Colonial SA and Anglo American plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. COL.MC values in EUR, AAL.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


COL.MC and AAL.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COL.MC and AAL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer