COIW vs. WDTE
COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -46.63% vs 20.90% for WDTE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WDTE.
Performance
COIW vs. WDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -35.32% return, which is significantly lower than WDTE's 8.25% return.
COIW
- 1D
- 7.79%
- 1M
- -23.46%
- YTD
- -35.32%
- 6M
- -48.91%
- 1Y
- -46.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW vs. WDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -35.32% | -25.92% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 8.25% | 8.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIW and WDTE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between COIW and WDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
COIW vs. WDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COIW
WDTE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
COIW
WDTE
Basic Materials
COIW
-
WDTE
Communication Services
COIW
-
WDTE
Consumer Cyclical
COIW
-
WDTE
Consumer Defensive
COIW
-
WDTE
Energy
COIW
-
WDTE
Healthcare
COIW
-
WDTE
Industrials
COIW
-
WDTE
Real Estate
COIW
-
WDTE
Technology
COIW
-
WDTE
Utilities
COIW
-
WDTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIW vs. WDTE — Risk / Return Rank
COIW
WDTE
COIW vs. WDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COIW | WDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.39 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.74 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 13.32 | -14.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIW | WDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 2.00 | -2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 1.24 | -1.70 |
Drawdowns
COIW vs. WDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than WDTE's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and WDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIW | WDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.55% | -15.85% | -58.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.55% | -7.65% | -66.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.71% | -2.63% | -68.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -1.82% | -36.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.34% | 1.57% | +45.77% |
Volatility
COIW vs. WDTE - Volatility Comparison
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 25.57% compared to Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) at 3.15%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIW | WDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.57% | 3.15% | +22.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.78% | 8.80% | +53.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.48% | 10.51% | +74.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.27% | 11.40% | +79.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.27% | 11.40% | +79.87% |
COIW vs. WDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WDTE's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIW vs. WDTE - Dividend Comparison
COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 235.93%, more than WDTE's 32.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 235.93% | 120.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 32.66% | 35.78% | 51.80% | 16.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIW and WDTE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIW has higher volatility (25.57%) compared to WDTE (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs WDTE's -15.85%.
On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 20.90% vs -46.63% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 20.90% return vs -46.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 235.93%, compared with 32.66% for WDTE.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 1.01% for WDTE.
WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIW and WDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer