COIW vs. TSLY
COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -46.46% vs 27.37% for TSLY. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLY.
Performance
COIW vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -33.93% return, which is significantly lower than TSLY's -2.70% return.
COIW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -20.57%
- YTD
- -33.93%
- 6M
- -47.79%
- 1Y
- -46.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -33.93% | -23.77% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -2.70% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIW and TSLY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIW vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
COIW
TSLY
COIW vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COIW | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.15 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.27 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 3.10 | -4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIW | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 0.72 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.30 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
COIW vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIW | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.55% | -49.52% | -25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.55% | -21.64% | -52.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.08% | -9.03% | -61.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.82% | -19.99% | -17.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.91% | 8.95% | +37.96% |
Volatility
COIW vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 22.47% compared to YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) at 10.02%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIW | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.47% | 10.02% | +12.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.92% | 22.40% | +39.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.69% | 38.20% | +46.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.93% | 45.48% | +45.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.93% | 45.48% | +45.45% |
COIW vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIW vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 224.62%, more than TSLY's 86.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 224.62% | 120.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 86.88% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIW and TSLY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIW has higher volatility (22.47%) compared to TSLY (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 27.37% vs -46.46% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLY has been the lower-risk option at 10.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 27.37% return vs -46.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 224.62%, compared with 86.88% for TSLY.
COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIW and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer