COIW vs. RDTY

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -71.21% vs 23.71% for RDTY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for RDTY.

Performance

COIW vs. RDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -36.41% return, which is significantly lower than RDTY's 18.88% return.

COIW

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: -2.39%
• 6M: -41.28%
• YTD: -36.41%
• 1Y: -71.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -41.30%

RDTY

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: 12.36%
• YTD: 18.88%
• 1Y: 23.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. RDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-36.41%	-8.20%
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	18.88%	10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and RDTY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.54

The correlation between COIW and RDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

COIW vs. RDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 2
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

RDTY

RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 59
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. RDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COIW	RDTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	1.38	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.56	1.99	-3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.24	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	2.59	-3.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	8.68	-10.04

COIW vs. RDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the RDTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and RDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COIW vs. RDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, which is greater than RDTY's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and RDTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	COIW	RDTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.01%	-17.31%	-57.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.56%	-9.20%	-65.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.21%	-0.85%	-70.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.96%	-2.56%	-38.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.97%	2.74%	+50.23%

Volatility

COIW vs. RDTY - Volatility Comparison

COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 19.87% compared to YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) at 4.07%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COIW	RDTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.87%	4.07%	+15.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.94%	13.21%	+50.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.10%	17.28%	+64.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.47%	21.63%	+67.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.47%	21.63%	+67.84%

COIW vs. RDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

COIW vs. RDTY - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 227.24%, more than RDTY's 43.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	227.24%	120.37%
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	43.10%	36.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COIW and RDTY in my portfolio?

COIW and RDTY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COIW or RDTY?

COIW has higher volatility (19.87%) compared to RDTY (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -75.01% vs RDTY's -17.31%.

Which ETF is better, COIW or RDTY?

On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 23.71% vs -71.21% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RDTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COIW or RDTY?

Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 23.71% return vs -71.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COIW or RDTY?

COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COIW or RDTY?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 227.24%, compared with 43.10% for RDTY.

What is the main difference between COIW and RDTY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 1.01% for RDTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.