PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COII vs. NFLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COII vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COII achieves a -40.76% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -48.15% return.


COII

1D
0.00%
1M
-17.01%
YTD
-40.76%
6M
-44.80%
1Y
-61.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLU

1D
-2.69%
1M
-35.41%
YTD
-48.15%
6M
-48.23%
1Y
-75.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COII vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
-40.76%-26.88%
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
-48.15%-47.75%

Correlation

The correlation between COII and NFLU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COII vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COII
COII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COII vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COIINFLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.72

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

-0.97

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-1.53

+0.24

COII vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COII Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COII and NFLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COII vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COII drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -77.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII and NFLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIINFLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.22%

-77.37%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.22%

-77.37%

+5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.51%

-77.37%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-29.29%

-11.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.75%

49.32%

-1.57%

Volatility

COII vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII) has a higher volatility of 17.23% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 16.03%. This indicates that COII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIINFLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.23%

16.03%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.90%

50.95%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.44%

67.79%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.56%

69.01%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.56%

69.01%

-1.45%

COII vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

COII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

COII vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

COII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.11%, while NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
88.23%41.52%
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COII and NFLU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COII has higher volatility (17.23%) compared to NFLU (16.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COII dropped -72.22% vs NFLU's -77.37%.

On 1-year performance, COII leads with -61.20% vs -75.26% for NFLU. On fees, COII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 16.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COII has performed better with a -61.20% return vs -75.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

COII has the higher dividend yield at 94.11%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

COII is categorized as Derivative Income, while NFLU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COII and 1.05% for NFLU.

COII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.91 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COII and NFLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer