PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COII.L vs. TSLI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
-44.45%-47.27%15.90%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
-12.24%30.51%23.80%
Different Trading Currencies

COII.L is traded in GBp, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COII.L achieves a -44.45% return, which is significantly lower than TSLI.L's -12.24% return.


COII.L

1D
-1.98%
1M
-10.24%
YTD
-44.45%
6M
-65.47%
1Y
-61.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLI.L

1D
0.66%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-12.24%
6M
1.40%
1Y
60.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COII.L and TSLI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

COII.L vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COII.L
COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLI.L
TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COII.LTSLI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.04

1.55

-2.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.68

2.13

-3.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.26

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

3.20

-4.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.58

7.56

-9.13

COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COII.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COII.L and TSLI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COII.LTSLI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

1.55

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

0.66

-1.52

Correlation

The correlation between COII.L and TSLI.L is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison

COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.92%, more than TSLI.L's 72.52% yield.


TTM20252024
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
131.92%191.72%18.99%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
72.52%73.68%19.21%

Drawdowns

COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COII.L drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, which is greater than TSLI.L's maximum drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII.L and TSLI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COII.LTSLI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.00%

-41.20%

-34.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.77%

-20.29%

-54.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.97%

-19.06%

-55.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-11.63%

-18.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.77%

7.89%

+31.88%

Volatility

COII.L vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) has a higher volatility of 17.53% compared to IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) at 8.94%. This indicates that COII.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COII.LTSLI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.53%

8.94%

+8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.45%

22.69%

+22.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.07%

39.41%

+19.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.41%

42.92%

+16.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.41%

42.92%

+16.49%