PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIA vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIA vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra COIN (COIA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIA achieves a -66.12% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.


COIA

1D
-8.21%
1M
-30.46%
YTD
-66.12%
6M
-70.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
4.23%
1M
-29.64%
YTD
-71.26%
6M
-71.01%
1Y
-73.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIA vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COIA
ProShares Ultra COIN
-66.12%-58.83%
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
-71.26%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between COIA and CRMG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIA vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIA vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra COIN (COIA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COIACRMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.70

COIA vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COIA vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIA drawdown since its inception was -90.45%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIA and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIACRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.45%

-79.83%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.97%

-78.97%

-11.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.40%

-39.18%

-24.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.41%

Volatility

COIA vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIACRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.95%

76.12%

+63.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

139.95%

75.39%

+64.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

139.95%

75.39%

+64.56%

COIA vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIA has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIA vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

COIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
COIA
ProShares Ultra COIN
5.27%1.10%
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COIA and CRMG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for COIA.

COIA has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for COIA and 0.75% for CRMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIA and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer