PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COHR vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COHR vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coherent Corp. (COHR) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COHR achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than PIT's 35.43% return.


COHR

1D
-7.49%
1M
-27.65%
6M
41.33%
YTD
50.06%
1Y
183.13%
3Y*
75.61%
5Y*
31.84%
10Y*
30.23%

PIT

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.46%
6M
27.62%
YTD
35.43%
1Y
48.42%
3Y*
20.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COHR vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
COHR
Coherent Corp.
50.06%94.84%117.62%24.02%4.31%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
35.43%21.63%6.77%-4.54%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between COHR and PIT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COHR vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COHR
COHR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
COHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
COHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COHR vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherent Corp. (COHR) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COHRPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

2.83

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.46

9.70

+6.76

COHR vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COHR and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COHR vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COHR drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHR and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COHRPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-17.20%

-63.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.12%

-17.20%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.85%

-17.20%

-37.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.12%

-8.57%

-26.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-4.25%

-30.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.17%

5.01%

+6.16%

Volatility

COHR vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

Coherent Corp. (COHR) has a higher volatility of 24.59% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 6.52%. This indicates that COHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COHRPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.59%

6.52%

+18.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.48%

19.74%

+40.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.43%

22.02%

+55.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.64%

17.63%

+45.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.09%

17.63%

+39.46%

Dividends

COHR vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

COHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%.


PositionTTM202520242023
COHR
Coherent Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.58%8.92%3.59%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


COHR and PIT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COHR has higher volatility (24.59%) compared to PIT (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COHR dropped -80.89% vs PIT's -17.20%.

COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COHR and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer