COFYX vs. NQCRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

COFYX (Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, COFYX returned 15.75%/yr vs 14.89%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COFYX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NQCRX.

Performance

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COFYX achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, COFYX has outperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 15.75%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.89% annualized return.

COFYX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 23.73%
• 3Y*: 20.66%
• 5Y*: 12.93%
• 10Y*: 15.75%

NQCRX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 37.43%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COFYX Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class	8.31%	17.49%	23.49%	32.22%	-18.51%	24.34%	22.37%	40.31%	-8.79%	20.61%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	18.43%	22.44%	17.74%	13.76%	-1.07%	25.38%	-0.27%	47.63%	-15.47%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between COFYX and NQCRX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012	0.84

The correlation between COFYX and NQCRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COFYX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COFYX

COFYX Risk / Return Rank: 48
COFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
COFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
COFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
COFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
COFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

NQCRX

NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 92
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COFYX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	3.01	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	4.13	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.52	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	6.32	-3.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.98	23.35	-13.38

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COFYX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COFYX drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, smaller than the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFYX and NQCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	COFYX	NQCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.43%	-57.85%	+25.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-6.07%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.91%	-17.21%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.01%	-17.61%	-14.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.43%	-41.84%	+9.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	0.00%	-1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-9.99%	+4.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	1.63%	+0.85%

Volatility

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that COFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COFYX	NQCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	4.14%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	9.92%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	12.77%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	15.62%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	18.94%	+0.15%

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COFYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

COFYX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

COFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than NQCRX's 6.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COFYX Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class	6.71%	7.27%	9.52%	3.11%	10.48%	13.50%	7.65%	10.86%	10.15%	4.82%	0.75%	5.96%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	6.17%	7.30%	6.82%	2.22%	4.63%	20.85%	17.95%	26.88%	34.12%	27.42%	10.74%	61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COFYX and NQCRX in my portfolio?

COFYX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COFYX or NQCRX?

COFYX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to NQCRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COFYX dropped -32.43% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.