COAL vs. PZT
COAL (Range Global Coal Index ETF) and PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COAL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the VettaFi Global Coal Index, while PZT is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COAL returned 69.32% vs 9.78% for PZT. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COAL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for PZT.
Performance
COAL vs. PZT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COAL achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than PZT's 3.19% return.
COAL
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- 8.50%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 26.74%
- 1Y
- 69.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZT
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
COAL vs. PZT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COAL Range Global Coal Index ETF | 24.29% | 12.65% | -16.01% |
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.19% | 1.76% | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between COAL and PZT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.01 |
The correlation between COAL and PZT shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COAL vs. PZT — Risk / Return Rank
COAL
PZT
COAL vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COAL | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 3.10 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 10.57 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COAL | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.07 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
COAL vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COAL drawdown since its inception was -42.29%, which is greater than PZT's maximum drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COAL and PZT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COAL | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.29% | -22.73% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -3.17% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -1.11% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -3.91% | -10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 0.93% | +5.59% |
Volatility
COAL vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison
Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) at 2.10%. This indicates that COAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COAL | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 2.10% | +8.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.30% | 3.45% | +17.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.45% | 4.74% | +24.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 6.63% | +20.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 6.96% | +20.65% |
COAL vs. PZT - Expense Ratio Comparison
COAL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PZT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
COAL vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison
COAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than PZT's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COAL Range Global Coal Index ETF | 2.12% | 2.63% | 1.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.57% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COAL and PZT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COAL has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to PZT (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COAL dropped -42.29% vs PZT's -22.73%.
On 1-year performance, COAL leads with 69.32% vs 9.78% for PZT. On fees, PZT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, PZT has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COAL has performed better with a 69.32% return vs 9.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PZT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for COAL.
PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.12% for COAL.
COAL is categorized as Energy Equities, while PZT is Municipal Bonds. COAL tracks VettaFi Global Coal Index, while PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for COAL and 0.28% for PZT.
COAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COAL and PZT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer