COAL vs. MGNR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

COAL (Range Global Coal Index ETF) and MGNR (American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. COAL is passively managed, while MGNR is actively managed. Over the past year, COAL returned 69.32% vs 74.30% for MGNR. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COAL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MGNR.

Performance

COAL vs. MGNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COAL achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly lower than MGNR's 25.87% return.

COAL

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: 8.50%
• YTD: 24.29%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 69.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MGNR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 25.87%
• 6M: 27.66%
• 1Y: 74.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COAL vs. MGNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
COAL Range Global Coal Index ETF	24.29%	12.65%	-11.40%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	25.87%	50.57%	22.78%

Correlation

The correlation between COAL and MGNR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024	0.50

The correlation between COAL and MGNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

COAL vs. MGNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COAL

COAL Risk / Return Rank: 71
COAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
COAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
COAL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
COAL Martin Ratio Rank: 61

MGNR

MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 90
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COAL vs. MGNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COAL	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	3.25	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.78	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.53	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	6.03	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.66	24.40	-13.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COAL vs. MGNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the MGNR Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COAL and MGNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COAL	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	3.25	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	1.76	-1.50

Drawdowns

COAL vs. MGNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COAL drawdown since its inception was -42.29%, which is greater than MGNR's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COAL and MGNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	COAL	MGNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.29%	-22.06%	-20.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.42%	-12.38%	-3.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-1.77%	+1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.12%	-3.86%	-10.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.52%	3.05%	+3.47%

Volatility

COAL vs. MGNR - Volatility Comparison

Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) at 6.57%. This indicates that COAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COAL	MGNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	6.57%	+4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.30%	17.65%	+3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.45%	23.01%	+6.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.61%	25.01%	+2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.61%	25.01%	+2.60%

COAL vs. MGNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

COAL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MGNR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

COAL vs. MGNR - Dividend Comparison

COAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than MGNR's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COAL Range Global Coal Index ETF	2.12%	2.63%	1.80%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	1.07%	1.17%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COAL and MGNR in my portfolio?

COAL and MGNR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COAL or MGNR?

COAL has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to MGNR (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COAL dropped -42.29% vs MGNR's -22.06%.

Which ETF is better, COAL or MGNR?

On 1-year performance, MGNR leads with 74.30% vs 69.32% for COAL. On fees, MGNR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MGNR has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COAL or MGNR?

Over the 1-year period, MGNR has performed better with a 74.30% return vs 69.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COAL or MGNR?

MGNR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for COAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COAL or MGNR?

COAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.07% for MGNR.

What is the main difference between COAL and MGNR?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for COAL and 0.75% for MGNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.