PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYE.TO achieves a -30.06% return, which is significantly lower than HBTE.NEO's 26.29% return.


CNYE.TO

1D
0.45%
1M
-16.55%
YTD
-30.06%
6M
-43.59%
1Y
-44.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBTE.NEO

1D
-2.27%
1M
4.71%
YTD
26.29%
6M
4.53%
1Y
59.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CNYE.TO and HBTE.NEO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.69

The correlation between CNYE.TO and HBTE.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYE.TO
CNYE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CNYE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HBTE.NEO
HBTE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNYE.TOHBTE.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.18

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

1.08

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

2.10

-3.11

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYE.TO and HBTE.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNYE.TOHBTE.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

0.90

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

1.37

-1.78

Drawdowns

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYE.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, which is greater than HBTE.NEO's maximum drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYE.TO and HBTE.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNYE.TOHBTE.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.18%

-55.75%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.18%

-55.75%

-16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.57%

-25.65%

-39.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-21.04%

-12.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.83%

28.56%

+15.27%

Volatility

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.11% compared to Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) at 15.53%. This indicates that CNYE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBTE.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNYE.TOHBTE.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.11%

15.53%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.81%

50.20%

+7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.13%

66.70%

+10.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.50%

66.71%

+15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.50%

66.71%

+15.79%

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HBTE.NEO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNYE.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Dividend Comparison

CNYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.78%, more than HBTE.NEO's 26.49% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNYE.TO and HBTE.NEO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNYE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNYE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.

CNYE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBTE.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CNYE.TO and 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNYE.TO and HBTE.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer