CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CNYE.TO (Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CNYE.TO returned -44.08% vs 63.73% for GLCC.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNYE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GLCC.TO.

Performance

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYE.TO achieves a -30.06% return, which is significantly lower than GLCC.TO's 1.66% return.

CNYE.TO

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -16.55%
• YTD: -30.06%
• 6M: -43.59%
• 1Y: -44.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLCC.TO

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 63.73%
• 3Y*: 41.85%
• 5Y*: 21.81%
• 10Y*: 14.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNYE.TO Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	-30.06%	-14.53%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	1.66%	94.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CNYE.TO and GLCC.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYE.TO

CNYE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4
CNYE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CNYE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CNYE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CNYE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CNYE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNYE.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	1.54	-2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	1.93	-2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.28	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	2.22	-2.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	5.97	-6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYE.TO and GLCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNYE.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57	1.54	-2.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	0.00	-0.41

Drawdowns

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYE.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, roughly equal to the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYE.TO and GLCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNYE.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.18%	-71.12%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.18%	-28.86%	-43.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.57%	-21.81%	-43.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.73%	-34.43%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.83%	10.70%	+33.13%

Volatility

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.11% compared to Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) at 15.10%. This indicates that CNYE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNYE.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.11%	15.10%	+7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.81%	34.13%	+23.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.13%	41.73%	+35.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.50%	31.95%	+50.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.50%	31.95%	+50.55%

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNYE.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.78%, more than GLCC.TO's 8.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNYE.TO Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	89.78%	48.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	8.51%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.09%	9.21%	11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNYE.TO and GLCC.TO in my portfolio?

CNYE.TO and GLCC.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNYE.TO or GLCC.TO?

On fees, CNYE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNYE.TO or GLCC.TO?

CNYE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

What is the main difference between CNYE.TO and GLCC.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CNYE.TO and 0.79% for GLCC.TO.