CNYA vs. BYDIY
CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while BYDIY (BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CNYA returned -1.47%/yr vs -9.64%/yr for BYDIY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNYA vs. BYDIY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than BYDIY's -27.93% return.
CNYA
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
BYDIY
- 1D
- 6.79%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- 6M
- -29.33%
- YTD
- -27.93%
- 1Y
- -24.26%
- 3Y*
- 0.86%
- 5Y*
- -9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA vs. BYDIY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 3.25% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | -1.99% |
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | -27.93% | -20.04% | 29.23% | 40.71% | 32.48% | -56.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNYA and BYDIY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNYA vs. BYDIY — Risk / Return Rank
CNYA
BYDIY
CNYA vs. BYDIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNYA | BYDIY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.00 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | -0.43 | +3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | -0.84 | +8.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNYA vs. BYDIY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum BYDIY drawdown of -68.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and BYDIY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNYA | BYDIY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.49% | -68.26% | +18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -56.59% | +48.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -68.26% | +34.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.65% | -68.26% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -59.40% | +41.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -36.20% | +15.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 28.86% | -25.85% |
Volatility
CNYA vs. BYDIY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) is 8.85%, while BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) has a volatility of 37.57%. This indicates that CNYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNYA | BYDIY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | 37.57% | -28.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 55.92% | -40.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 72.28% | -52.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 70.49% | -46.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 69.50% | -45.89% |
Dividends
CNYA vs. BYDIY - Dividend Comparison
CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while BYDIY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited | 0.00% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.48% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.82% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNYA and BYDIY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYDIY has higher volatility (37.57%) compared to CNYA (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNYA dropped -49.49% vs BYDIY's -68.26%.
CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNYA and BYDIY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer