CNYA vs. BYDIY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while BYDIY (BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CNYA returned -1.06%/yr vs -5.34%/yr for BYDIY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CNYA vs. BYDIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than BYDIY's -9.60% return.

CNYA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 13.79%
• 1Y: 37.95%
• 3Y*: 11.00%
• 5Y*: -1.06%
• 10Y*: —

BYDIY

• 1D: 10.30%
• 1M: 17.44%
• YTD: -9.60%
• 6M: -12.52%
• 1Y: -0.64%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: -5.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNYA vs. BYDIY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	9.30%	26.48%	10.78%	-13.76%	-26.51%	-2.66%
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited	-9.60%	-20.04%	29.23%	40.71%	32.48%	-56.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CNYA and BYDIY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021	0.18

Return for Risk

CNYA vs. BYDIY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYA

CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 71
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BYDIY

BYDIY Risk / Return Rank: 40
BYDIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BYDIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BYDIY Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BYDIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
BYDIY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYA vs. BYDIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNYA	BYDIY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	-0.01	+2.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	0.44	+2.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.05	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.02	-0.01	+5.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.84	-0.03	+14.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNYA vs. BYDIY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYA Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the BYDIY Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYA and BYDIY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNYA	BYDIY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	-0.01	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	-0.08	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	-0.08	+0.35

Drawdowns

CNYA vs. BYDIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum BYDIY drawdown of -67.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and BYDIY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNYA	BYDIY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.49%	-67.99%	+18.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-43.93%	+36.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.35%	-59.00%	+25.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.70%	-67.99%	+23.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.42%	-49.07%	+35.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.69%	-35.65%	+14.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	24.01%	-21.45%

Volatility

CNYA vs. BYDIY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) is 6.42%, while BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited (BYDIY) has a volatility of 24.95%. This indicates that CNYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNYA	BYDIY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.42%	24.95%	-18.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	39.65%	-27.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.32%	61.05%	-43.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.81%	67.90%	-44.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.56%	67.77%	-44.21%

Dividends

CNYA vs. BYDIY - Dividend Comparison

CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than BYDIY's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BYDIY BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited	1.96%	1.77%	1.31%	0.53%	0.48%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	1.75%	1.92%	2.51%	4.23%	2.69%	1.11%	1.06%	1.21%	3.92%	0.97%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNYA and BYDIY in my portfolio?

CNYA and BYDIY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNYA or BYDIY?

BYDIY has higher volatility (24.95%) compared to CNYA (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNYA dropped -49.49% vs BYDIY's -67.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.