PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE).

CNYA and 36BZ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. 36BZ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. Both CNYA and 36BZ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF		-1.50%26.48%10.78%-13.76%-26.51%3.53%41.54%35.95%-26.56%30.99%
36BZ.DE
iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF		-0.61%24.46%13.05%-14.51%-25.60%4.47%41.06%34.31%-27.09%31.15%
Different Trading Currencies

CNYA is traded in USD, while 36BZ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 36BZ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than 36BZ.DE's -0.57% return.

CNYA

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
0.29%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-1.54%
10Y*
—

36BZ.DE

1D
1.15%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
1.16%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
-1.27%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI China A ETF

iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF

Often compared with CNYA:
CNYA vs. MCHICNYA vs. ASHRCNYA vs. ICHN.ASCNYA vs. KBACNYA vs. ICGA.DECNYA vs. FLCHCNYA vs. GXC
Often compared with 36BZ.DE:
36BZ.DE vs. ICGA.DE36BZ.DE vs. IQQC.DE36BZ.DE vs. EXXU.DE36BZ.DE vs. MWRD.L36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE36BZ.DE vs. CXSE36BZ.DE vs. ^GSPC

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
36BZ.DE
iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
36BZ.DE
36BZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
36BZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36BZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
36BZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
36BZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
36BZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CNYA36BZ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.95

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.63

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.10

10.50

-1.40

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the 36BZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYA and 36BZ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CNYA36BZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.06

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.20

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.02

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between CNYA and 36BZ.DE is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while 36BZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF		1.95%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%
36BZ.DE
iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and 36BZ.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CNYA36BZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-53.30%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-11.39%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.11%

-41.94%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-43.38%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.97%

-17.56%

-4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-30.47%

+9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.96%

-0.27%

Volatility

CNYA vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CNYA36BZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.63%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

11.36%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.86%

17.48%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

22.66%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.59%

22.94%

+0.65%