PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CNX1.L is traded in GBp, while VVSM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VVSM.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNX1.L achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than VVSM.DE's 86.77% return.


CNX1.L

1D
2.47%
1M
0.79%
YTD
17.14%
6M
17.43%
1Y
38.31%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
22.20%

VVSM.DE

1D
5.76%
1M
13.64%
YTD
86.77%
6M
91.12%
1Y
168.24%
3Y*
55.53%
5Y*
38.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.14%11.57%28.51%47.71%-25.53%29.50%3.57%
VVSM.DE
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
86.77%40.16%25.74%66.80%-29.11%47.21%-15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CNX1.L and VVSM.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020

0.79

The correlation between CNX1.L and VVSM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VVSM.DE
VVSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VVSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNX1.LVVSM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.66

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

14.17

-10.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

46.21

-36.35

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is lower than the VVSM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 5.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNX1.L and VVSM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNX1.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum VVSM.DE drawdown of -36.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNX1.L and VVSM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNX1.LVVSM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-36.84%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-11.58%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-36.84%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.56%

-36.84%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-1.48%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-10.40%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

3.56%

+0.24%

Volatility

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) is 5.76%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE) has a volatility of 13.64%. This indicates that CNX1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVSM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNX1.LVVSM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

13.64%

-7.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

25.76%

-14.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

32.61%

-17.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.31%

30.96%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.51%

31.50%

-5.99%

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNX1.L has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VVSM.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNX1.L vs. VVSM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNX1.L nor VVSM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CNX1.L and VVSM.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VVSM.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VVSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.

CNX1.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VVSM.DE is Semiconductors. CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VVSM.DE tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNX1.L and 0.35% for VVSM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNX1.L and VVSM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer