PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNX1.L vs. FKMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K (FKMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CNX1.L is traded in GBp, while FKMCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FKMCX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNX1.L achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly lower than FKMCX's 21.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CNX1.L has outperformed FKMCX with an annualized return of 22.01%, while FKMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.


CNX1.L

1D
-0.81%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
17.68%
6M
17.40%
1Y
36.42%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
22.01%

FKMCX

1D
0.77%
1M
4.45%
YTD
21.90%
6M
19.71%
1Y
36.87%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.68%11.57%28.51%47.71%-25.53%29.50%43.24%33.63%4.62%20.13%
FKMCX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K
21.90%3.90%16.66%5.56%4.85%29.94%8.29%20.73%-4.88%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CNX1.L and FKMCX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.49

The correlation between CNX1.L and FKMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FKMCX
FKMCX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FKMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FKMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K (FKMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNX1.LFKMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

4.76

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

17.04

-7.52

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FKMCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNX1.L and FKMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNX1.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum FKMCX drawdown of -46.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNX1.L and FKMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNX1.LFKMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-46.20%

+18.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-7.51%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-24.27%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.56%

-24.27%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

-33.64%

+6.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-0.31%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-6.31%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

2.09%

+1.72%

Volatility

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K (FKMCX) at 5.14%. This indicates that CNX1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNX1.LFKMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

5.14%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

12.07%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

15.44%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.35%

16.60%

+13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

18.18%

+7.30%

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNX1.L has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FKMCX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNX1.L vs. FKMCX - Dividend Comparison

CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FKMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FKMCX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K
5.22%1.85%8.91%2.69%5.49%12.87%6.82%6.73%13.52%6.66%8.36%14.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNX1.L and FKMCX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNX1.L and FKMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer