CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L
CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DFNG.L (VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while DFNG.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNX1.L returned 23.65%/yr vs 37.60%/yr for DFNG.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNX1.L charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DFNG.L.
Performance
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CNX1.L is traded in GBp, while DFNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DFNG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNX1.L achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than DFNG.L's 1.28% return.
CNX1.L
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 38.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 22.20%
DFNG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 12.40%
- 3Y*
- 37.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.14% | 11.57% | 28.51% | 27.03% |
DFNG.L VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP | 1.28% | 56.54% | 46.20% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNX1.L and DFNG.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNX1.L
DFNG.L
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNX1.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.12 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 0.74 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 1.83 | +8.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNX1.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than DFNG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNX1.L and DFNG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNX1.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -22.59% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.03% | -19.68% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -19.68% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -17.26% | +14.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -4.98% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 7.94% | -4.14% |
Volatility
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) is 5.76%, while VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that CNX1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNX1.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 8.19% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 19.02% | -7.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 24.56% | -9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.31% | 23.38% | +6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.51% | 23.38% | +2.13% |
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNX1.L has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNX1.L vs. DFNG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNX1.L nor DFNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNX1.L and DFNG.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNX1.L is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNX1.L is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.
CNX1.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DFNG.L is Aerospace & Defense. CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNX1.L and 0.55% for DFNG.L.
Find the right allocation for CNX1.L and DFNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer