CNWIX vs. FZAEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX).
CNWIX is managed by Calamos. FZAEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013.
Performance
CNWIX vs. FZAEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNWIX vs. FZAEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 7.40% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
FZAEX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z | 4.43% | 40.25% | 9.43% | 8.60% | -19.75% | -2.50% | 30.63% | 29.94% | -17.95% | 46.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNWIX achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly higher than FZAEX's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CNWIX has underperformed FZAEX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while FZAEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.
CNWIX
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -13.56%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 30.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
FZAEX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 36.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNWIX vs. FZAEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNWIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAEX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNWIX vs. FZAEX — Risk / Return Rank
CNWIX
FZAEX
CNWIX vs. FZAEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNWIX | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 2.05 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 2.58 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.69 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | 10.21 | -3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNWIX | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 2.05 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.29 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.59 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNWIX and FZAEX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNWIX vs. FZAEX - Dividend Comparison
CNWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FZAEX's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
FZAEX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z | 1.58% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 1.23% | 5.35% | 2.23% | 11.13% | 0.78% | 0.10% | 0.63% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
CNWIX vs. FZAEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNWIX drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FZAEX drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNWIX and FZAEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNWIX | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.57% | -41.73% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -13.71% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.47% | -40.39% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.57% | -41.73% | -1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -10.73% | -3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -12.53% | -4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 3.60% | +0.66% |
Volatility
CNWIX vs. FZAEX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) at 9.38%. This indicates that CNWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNWIX | FZAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.15% | 9.38% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.00% | 13.47% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 18.66% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 18.52% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 18.58% | +5.50% |