CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE
CNUA.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNUA.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNUA.DE returned 3.68%/yr vs -3.95%/yr for FLXC.DE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNUA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNUA.DE achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
CNUA.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 40.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNUA.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 13.12% | 15.18% | 24.15% | -14.62% | -18.77% | 18.43% | 30.72% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNUA.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CNUA.DE and FLXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNUA.DE
FLXC.DE
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNUA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.06 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 0.31 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 0.64 | +4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNUA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.27 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.15 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.09 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, smaller than the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNUA.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNUA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.81% | -55.61% | +17.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -15.19% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.63% | -24.70% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.81% | -49.07% | +11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -30.89% | +28.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -27.95% | +12.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 7.38% | +0.73% |
Volatility
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) is 4.93%, while Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that CNUA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNUA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 6.78% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 12.35% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.65% | 17.78% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 26.71% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 26.20% | +0.04% |
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNUA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNUA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNUA.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNUA.DE and FLXC.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CNUA.DE.
CNUA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CNUA.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNUA.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer