CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
CNUA.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CNUA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNUA.DE returned 3.68%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNUA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.
Performance
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNUA.DE achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBQ.DE's 11.15% return.
CNUA.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 40.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.51%
- 10Y*
- —
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNUA.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 13.12% | 15.18% | 24.15% | -14.62% | -18.77% | 18.43% | 8.44% |
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.15% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 43.62% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNUA.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNUA.DE
4UBQ.DE
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNUA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.10 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 15.73 | -10.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNUA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.47 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 1.00 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.11 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNUA.DE and 4UBQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNUA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.81% | -23.35% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -6.93% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.63% | -23.35% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.81% | -23.35% | -14.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | 0.00% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -4.02% | -11.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 1.81% | +6.30% |
Volatility
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 2.81%. This indicates that CNUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNUA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 2.81% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 7.61% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.65% | 11.53% | +16.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 15.27% | +9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 15.39% | +10.85% |
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNUA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNUA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNUA.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNUA.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CNUA.DE.
CNUA.DE is categorized as China Equities, while 4UBQ.DE is S&P 500. CNUA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CNUA.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNUA.DE and 4UBQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer