CNS vs. MKTX
CNS (Cohen & Steers, Inc.) and MKTX (MarketAxess Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CNS in Asset Management, MKTX in Capital Markets. Over the past 10 years, CNS returned 12.13%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for MKTX. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CNS vs. MKTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNS achieves a 33.64% return, which is significantly higher than MKTX's -9.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CNS has outperformed MKTX with an annualized return of 12.13%, while MKTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.
CNS
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 30.56%
- YTD
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.77%
MKTX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 39.28%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- -20.43%
- 3Y*
- -13.54%
- 5Y*
- -18.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.24M | $22.05M | $21.83M | |
| $282.10M | $167.19M | $119.48M |
CNS vs. MKTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 33.64% | -29.77% | 25.53% | 21.84% | -28.00% | 29.00% | 23.45% | 93.97% | -19.74% | 48.05% |
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | -9.56% | -18.54% | -21.58% | 6.11% | -31.50% | -27.51% | 51.28% | 80.66% | 5.63% | 38.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNS and MKTX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004 | 0.33 |
The correlation between CNS and MKTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNS:
$4.23B
MKTX:
$5.71B
CNS:
$3.26
MKTX:
$8.49
CNS:
25.26
MKTX:
19.12
CNS:
7.10
MKTX:
6.75
CNS:
7.24
MKTX:
4.63
CNS:
$599.09M
MKTX:
$869.77M
CNS:
$458.91M
MKTX:
$598.39M
CNS:
$226.36M
MKTX:
$445.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNS vs. MKTX — Risk / Return Rank
CNS
MKTX
CNS vs. MKTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNS | MKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.93 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.42 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | -0.81 | +2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNS vs. MKTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNS drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than MKTX's maximum drawdown of -80.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNS and MKTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNS | MKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -80.60% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.32% | -46.94% | +23.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.59% | -61.77% | +19.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.25% | -76.38% | +30.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -80.23% | +25.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.70% | -70.58% | +51.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.19% | -29.03% | +5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 24.16% | -11.42% |
Volatility
CNS vs. MKTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) is 8.35%, while MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) has a volatility of 26.38%. This indicates that CNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNS | MKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 26.38% | -18.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.64% | 33.85% | -15.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.28% | 41.52% | -14.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 35.71% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.05% | 33.96% | -0.91% |
Dividends
CNS vs. MKTX - Dividend Comparison
CNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than MKTX's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 3.14% | 3.95% | 2.56% | 3.01% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 3.45% | 5.48% | 11.13% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.43% |
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 1.90% | 1.68% | 1.64% | 0.98% | 1.00% | 0.64% | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.72% |
Financials
CNS vs. MKTX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers, Inc. and MarketAxess Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNS vs. MKTX - Profitability Comparison
CNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cohen & Steers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 147.42M and revenue of 166.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.3%.
MKTX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 141.44M and revenue of 218.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.8%.
CNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cohen & Steers, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.96M and revenue of 166.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.1%.
MKTX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 89.88M and revenue of 218.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.2%.
CNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cohen & Steers, Inc. reported a net income of 49.34M and revenue of 166.92M, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.
MKTX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 68.55M and revenue of 218.42M, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNS and MKTX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKTX has higher volatility (26.38%) compared to CNS (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNS dropped -85.40% vs MKTX's -80.60%.
CNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNS and MKTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer