CNS vs. RBCAA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNS or RBCAA.
Key characteristics
| CNS | RBCAA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 36.12% | 42.09% |
| 1Y Return | 74.59% | 65.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.49% | 14.88% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.12% | 14.30% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.65% | 15.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.53 | 1.74 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.30 | 2.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.05 | 3.81 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.41 | 7.29 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.08% | 8.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.27% | 36.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -85.40% | -64.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.41% | -1.88% |
Fundamentals
| CNS | RBCAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.31B | $1.52B |
| EPS | $2.61 | $5.26 |
| PE Ratio | 39.17 | 14.85 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.39 | 1.75 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $511.10M | $493.65M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $442.34M | $493.98M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $208.06M | $40.92M |
Correlation
The correlation between CNS and RBCAA is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNS vs. RBCAA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNS achieves a 36.12% return, which is significantly lower than RBCAA's 42.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CNS has underperformed RBCAA with an annualized return of 13.65%, while RBCAA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNS vs. RBCAA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNS vs. RBCAA - Dividend Comparison
CNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than RBCAA's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 1.76% | 3.01% | 3.41% | 1.95% | 2.10% | 2.29% | 11.13% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 4.92% | 4.47% | 4.49% |
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 2.08% | 2.71% | 3.33% | 2.42% | 3.17% | 2.26% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.09% | 2.96% | 2.98% | 2.82% |
Drawdowns
CNS vs. RBCAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNS drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than RBCAA's maximum drawdown of -64.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNS and RBCAA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNS vs. RBCAA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) is 8.00%, while Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) has a volatility of 16.42%. This indicates that CNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBCAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CNS vs. RBCAA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers, Inc. and Republic Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities