CNS vs. RBCAA
CNS (Cohen & Steers, Inc.) and RBCAA (Republic Bancorp, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CNS in Asset Management, RBCAA in Banks - Regional. Over the past 10 years, CNS returned 11.86%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for RBCAA. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNS vs. RBCAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNS achieves a 23.52% return, which is significantly lower than RBCAA's 27.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CNS has underperformed RBCAA with an annualized return of 11.86%, while RBCAA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.
CNS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
RBCAA
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 27.98%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 30.45%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
CNS vs. RBCAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 23.52% | -29.77% | 25.53% | 21.84% | -28.00% | 29.00% | 23.45% | 93.97% | -19.74% | 48.05% |
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 27.98% | 1.29% | 30.27% | 39.36% | -16.94% | 44.53% | -20.18% | 23.71% | 4.17% | -1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNS and RBCAA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2004 | 0.43 |
The correlation between CNS and RBCAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNS:
$3.92B
RBCAA:
$1.73B
CNS:
$3.02
RBCAA:
$4.24
CNS:
25.17
RBCAA:
20.53
CNS:
6.82
RBCAA:
4.86
CNS:
6.96
RBCAA:
1.52
CNS:
$574.61M
RBCAA:
$355.22M
CNS:
$381.59M
RBCAA:
$264.60M
CNS:
$206.82M
RBCAA:
$112.84M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNS vs. RBCAA — Risk / Return Rank
CNS
RBCAA
CNS vs. RBCAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNS | RBCAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.65 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 3.44 | -3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNS vs. RBCAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNS drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than RBCAA's maximum drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNS and RBCAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNS | RBCAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -64.45% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.32% | -15.98% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.59% | -21.56% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.25% | -31.07% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -44.67% | -10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.85% | -0.09% | -24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -19.95% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.78% | 7.62% | +5.16% |
Volatility
CNS vs. RBCAA - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) at 7.27%. This indicates that CNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBCAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNS | RBCAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 7.27% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.64% | 18.57% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.00% | 26.17% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.08% | 27.83% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 32.91% | +0.08% |
Dividends
CNS vs. RBCAA - Dividend Comparison
CNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than RBCAA's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 3.39% | 3.95% | 2.56% | 3.01% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 3.45% | 5.48% | 11.13% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.43% |
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 2.17% | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.71% | 3.33% | 2.42% | 3.17% | 2.26% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.09% | 2.96% |
Financials
CNS vs. RBCAA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers, Inc. and Republic Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CNS and RBCAA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNS has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to RBCAA (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNS dropped -85.40% vs RBCAA's -64.45%.
RBCAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNS and RBCAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer