CNS vs. RBCAA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA).
Performance
CNS vs. RBCAA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNS vs. RBCAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 0.67% | -29.77% | 25.53% | 21.84% | -28.00% | 29.00% | 23.45% | 93.97% | -19.74% | 48.05% |
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 3.01% | 1.29% | 30.27% | 39.36% | -16.94% | 44.53% | -20.18% | 23.71% | 4.17% | -1.55% |
Fundamentals
CNS:
$3.23B
RBCAA:
$1.40B
CNS:
$2.81
RBCAA:
$5.48
CNS:
22.26
RBCAA:
12.87
CNS:
5.68
RBCAA:
3.51
CNS:
5.75
RBCAA:
1.27
CNS:
$567.80M
RBCAA:
$397.88M
CNS:
$326.52M
RBCAA:
$296.94M
CNS:
$200.44M
RBCAA:
$149.08M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNS achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than RBCAA's 3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CNS has underperformed RBCAA with an annualized return of 9.70%, while RBCAA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.
CNS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- -2.79%
- 1Y
- -19.22%
- 3Y*
- 2.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
RBCAA
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- 1Y
- 13.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNS vs. RBCAA — Risk / Return Rank
CNS
RBCAA
CNS vs. RBCAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNS | RBCAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 0.52 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | 0.93 | -1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.77 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 1.58 | -2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNS | RBCAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 0.52 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.45 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.42 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.23 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNS and RBCAA is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CNS vs. RBCAA - Dividend Comparison
CNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than RBCAA's 2.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 4.04% | 3.95% | 2.56% | 3.01% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 3.45% | 5.48% | 11.13% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.43% |
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 2.62% | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.71% | 3.33% | 2.42% | 3.17% | 2.26% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.09% | 2.96% |
Drawdowns
CNS vs. RBCAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNS drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than RBCAA's maximum drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNS and RBCAA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNS | RBCAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -64.45% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.80% | -15.98% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.25% | -31.07% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -44.67% | -10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.75% | -7.53% | -31.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -20.10% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.43% | 7.82% | +8.61% |
Volatility
CNS vs. RBCAA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) is 5.88%, while Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that CNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBCAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNS | RBCAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 6.27% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.99% | 18.36% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.68% | 25.98% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.97% | 27.66% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.00% | 32.85% | +0.15% |
Financials
CNS vs. RBCAA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers, Inc. and Republic Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities