PortfoliosLab logo
CNS vs. RBCAA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNS and RBCAA is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNS vs. RBCAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNS:

0.67

RBCAA:

1.12

Sortino Ratio

CNS:

1.11

RBCAA:

1.81

Omega Ratio

CNS:

1.14

RBCAA:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

CNS:

0.60

RBCAA:

1.83

Martin Ratio

CNS:

1.41

RBCAA:

3.83

Ulcer Index

CNS:

14.22%

RBCAA:

10.31%

Daily Std Dev

CNS:

30.69%

RBCAA:

35.25%

Max Drawdown

CNS:

-85.40%

RBCAA:

-64.45%

Current Drawdown

CNS:

-21.10%

RBCAA:

-5.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNS:

$4.22B

RBCAA:

$1.43B

EPS

CNS:

$3.06

RBCAA:

$6.05

PE Ratio

CNS:

27.08

RBCAA:

12.08

PEG Ratio

CNS:

1.12

RBCAA:

1.75

PS Ratio

CNS:

7.98

RBCAA:

3.97

PB Ratio

CNS:

8.07

RBCAA:

1.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNS:

$544.77M

RBCAA:

$485.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNS:

$317.50M

RBCAA:

$354.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

CNS:

$202.57M

RBCAA:

$129.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNS achieves a -8.91% return, which is significantly lower than RBCAA's 5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CNS has underperformed RBCAA with an annualized return of 13.05%, while RBCAA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.


CNS

YTD

-8.91%

1M

13.52%

6M

-19.43%

1Y

20.49%

5Y*

11.13%

10Y*

13.05%

RBCAA

YTD

5.31%

1M

20.46%

6M

-5.25%

1Y

39.13%

5Y*

24.50%

10Y*

15.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNS vs. RBCAA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNS is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNS is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNS is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNS is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNS is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNS is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RBCAA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RBCAA is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RBCAA is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RBCAA is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RBCAA is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RBCAA is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RBCAA is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNS vs. RBCAA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the RBCAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNS and RBCAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CNS vs. RBCAA - Dividend Comparison

CNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than RBCAA's 2.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc.
2.92%2.56%3.01%3.41%2.81%2.10%2.29%11.13%4.48%4.58%4.92%4.47%
RBCAA
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
2.29%2.33%2.71%3.33%2.42%3.17%2.26%2.50%2.29%2.09%2.96%2.98%

Drawdowns

CNS vs. RBCAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNS drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than RBCAA's maximum drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNS and RBCAA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CNS vs. RBCAA - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) at 6.27%. This indicates that CNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBCAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CNS vs. RBCAA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers, Inc. and Republic Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M20212022202320242025
139.84M
162.99M
(CNS) Total Revenue
(RBCAA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items