CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
CNIE.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and 36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNIE.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG while 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNIE.DE returned -0.19%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for 36BZ.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNIE.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 36BZ.DE.
Performance
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNIE.DE achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than 36BZ.DE's 9.71% return.
CNIE.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -5.32%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNIE.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -3.41% | 8.76% | 7.28% | -12.40% | -22.84% | 8.74% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNIE.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CNIE.DE and 36BZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNIE.DE
36BZ.DE
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNIE.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 5.10 | -4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 13.77 | -12.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNIE.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.11 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.03 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNIE.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, smaller than the maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNIE.DE and 36BZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNIE.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.69% | -53.30% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -6.57% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -28.01% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.25% | -10.22% | -15.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.67% | -30.19% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 2.44% | +3.26% |
Volatility
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) is 4.49%, while iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that CNIE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 36BZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNIE.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 5.55% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 10.96% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 15.83% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 21.44% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 22.10% | +2.17% |
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNIE.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNIE.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNIE.DE nor 36BZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNIE.DE and 36BZ.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 36BZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36BZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNIE.DE.
CNIE.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG, while 36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNIE.DE and 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNIE.DE and 36BZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer