PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNI vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNI vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNI achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CNI has outperformed T with an annualized return of 9.51%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


CNI

1D
0.60%
1M
6.94%
YTD
21.78%
6M
22.98%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
9.51%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNI vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
21.78%-0.10%-17.51%7.84%-1.86%13.70%23.66%24.26%-8.49%25.03%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CNI and T is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 1996

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between CNI and T has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

CNI:

CA$7.60

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

CNI:

21.89

T:

7.74

PS Ratio

CNI:

5.96

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNI:

CA$17.29B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNI:

CA$7.64B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNI:

CA$8.60B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNI vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNI
CNI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNI vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.92

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.59

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

-1.22

+3.30

CNI vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNI Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNI and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNI vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNI drawdown since its inception was -46.66%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNI and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.66%

-64.15%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-21.87%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-21.87%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-32.01%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.15%

-42.35%

+13.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-18.12%

+12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-15.72%

+6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.68%

10.64%

-2.96%

Volatility

CNI vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) is 4.12%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that CNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

8.21%

-4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.30%

17.80%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

22.13%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

24.01%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.67%

23.73%

-1.06%

Dividends

CNI vs. T - Dividend Comparison

CNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
2.20%2.58%2.43%1.85%1.41%1.61%1.59%1.79%2.01%2.00%2.23%2.24%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

CNI vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian National Railway Company and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
4.39B
33.47B
(CNI) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CNI values in CAD, T values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CNI and T have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to CNI (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNI dropped -46.66% vs T's -64.15%.

CNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNI and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer