CNH vs. NWG
CNH (CNH Industrial NV) and NWG (NatWest Group plc) are both stocks. CNH operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while NWG operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CNH returned 5.69%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for NWG. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNH vs. NWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNH achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than NWG's -5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CNH has underperformed NWG with an annualized return of 5.69%, while NWG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.97% annualized return.
CNH
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- -15.29%
- 3Y*
- -5.81%
- 5Y*
- -7.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
NWG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 43.71%
- 5Y*
- 30.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.97%
CNH vs. NWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNH CNH Industrial NV | 16.95% | -17.10% | -3.12% | -22.01% | -15.74% | 52.59% | 16.73% | 21.64% | -30.31% | 57.67% |
NWG NatWest Group plc | -5.18% | 81.29% | 92.31% | -4.69% | 11.23% | 39.24% | -24.92% | 29.18% | -26.25% | 38.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNH and NWG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CNH and NWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNH:
$13.29B
NWG:
$32.00B
CNH:
$0.32
NWG:
$2.95
CNH:
33.69
NWG:
5.39
CNH:
0.74
NWG:
1.09
CNH:
1.69
NWG:
0.73
CNH:
$18.09B
NWG:
$29.58B
CNH:
$4.45B
NWG:
$16.97B
CNH:
$2.09B
NWG:
$9.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNH vs. NWG — Risk / Return Rank
CNH
NWG
CNH vs. NWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNH Industrial NV (CNH) and NatWest Group plc (NWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNH | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.11 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 0.71 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 1.80 | -2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNH | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 0.55 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.91 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.42 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.11 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
CNH vs. NWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNH drawdown since its inception was -65.82%, smaller than the maximum NWG drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNH and NWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNH | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.82% | -96.96% | +31.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.19% | -24.03% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.66% | -34.62% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.76% | -40.56% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.82% | -67.34% | +1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.90% | -71.45% | +32.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.59% | -86.22% | +57.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 9.60% | +11.25% |
Volatility
CNH vs. NWG - Volatility Comparison
CNH Industrial NV (CNH) has a higher volatility of 13.47% compared to NatWest Group plc (NWG) at 8.65%. This indicates that CNH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNH | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.47% | 8.65% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.64% | 23.92% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.47% | 31.41% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.77% | 33.53% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.65% | 38.32% | -1.67% |
Dividends
CNH vs. NWG - Dividend Comparison
CNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than NWG's 5.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNH CNH Industrial NV | 0.94% | 2.71% | 4.15% | 3.25% | 1.88% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 1.85% | 1.87% | 1.64% | 1.50% | 2.92% |
NWG NatWest Group plc | 5.51% | 3.69% | 4.36% | 9.42% | 11.57% | 2.74% | 4.59% | 9.75% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CNH vs. NWG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNH Industrial NV and NatWest Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNH vs. NWG - Profitability Comparison
CNH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NWG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.36B and revenue of 7.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
CNH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
NWG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
CNH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a net income of 17.00M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
NWG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a net income of 1.51B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNH and NWG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNH has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to NWG (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNH dropped -65.82% vs NWG's -96.96%.
NWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNH and NWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer