AGCO vs. AG
AGCO (AGCO Corporation) and AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) are both stocks. AGCO operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while AG operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, AGCO returned 11.10%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for AG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGCO vs. AG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGCO achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly higher than AG's -0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, AGCO has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 11.10%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower 2.51% annualized return.
AGCO
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 11.72%
- 3Y*
- -3.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
AG
- 1D
- -6.88%
- 1M
- -15.17%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -4.95%
- 1Y
- 104.39%
- 3Y*
- 46.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
AGCO vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGCO AGCO Corporation | 7.11% | 12.85% | -20.33% | -7.90% | 24.99% | 16.16% | 34.77% | 40.02% | -21.30% | 24.50% |
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | -0.84% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGCO and AG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AGCO and AG shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGCO:
$8.09B
AG:
$8.28B
AGCO:
$10.42
AG:
$0.60
AGCO:
10.67
AG:
27.67
AGCO:
0.41
AG:
0.49
AGCO:
0.79
AG:
5.46
AGCO:
1.88
AG:
2.85
AGCO:
$10.37B
AG:
$1.49B
AGCO:
$2.58B
AG:
$646.49M
AGCO:
$984.20M
AG:
$824.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGCO vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank
AGCO
AG
AGCO vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGCO Corporation (AGCO) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGCO | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 2.06 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 4.82 | -3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGCO vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGCO drawdown since its inception was -83.96%, smaller than the maximum AG drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGCO and AG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGCO | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.96% | -90.20% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.42% | -50.88% | +28.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.50% | -50.88% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.50% | -73.18% | +29.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.07% | -80.82% | +26.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -48.41% | +27.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.72% | -59.15% | +29.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.14% | 21.74% | -10.60% |
Volatility
AGCO vs. AG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is 9.26%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 24.27%. This indicates that AGCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGCO | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 24.27% | -15.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.34% | 58.70% | -34.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 74.54% | -40.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.11% | 61.91% | -26.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 62.08% | -27.07% |
Dividends
AGCO vs. AG - Dividend Comparison
AGCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than AG's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.21% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGCO AGCO Corporation | 1.05% | 1.11% | 3.92% | 5.03% | 3.91% | 4.10% | 0.62% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.78% | 0.90% | 1.06% |
Financials
AGCO vs. AG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AGCO Corporation and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGCO vs. AG - Profitability Comparison
AGCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.40M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.
AG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 259.78M and revenue of 470.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
AGCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported an operating income of 80.70M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
AG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 232.71M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.
AGCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a net income of 55.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
AG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 126.32M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGCO and AG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (24.27%) compared to AGCO (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGCO dropped -83.96% vs AG's -90.20%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGCO and AG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer