CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L
CNEW.L (VanEck New China UCITS ETF) and MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNEW.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader New China Screened Index, while MOAT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNEW.L returned 1.29%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for MOAT.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNEW.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOAT.L.
Performance
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNEW.L achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT.L's 0.19% return.
CNEW.L
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -10.84%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT.L
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 8.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNEW.L VanEck New China UCITS ETF | -6.01% | 23.92% | -0.36% | -9.27% | -28.05% | 6.19% |
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | 0.19% | 7.34% | 11.12% | 18.37% | -18.70% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNEW.L and MOAT.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNEW.L
MOAT.L
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China UCITS ETF (CNEW.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNEW.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.11 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 0.70 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 1.75 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNEW.L drawdown since its inception was -46.53%, which is greater than MOAT.L's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNEW.L and MOAT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNEW.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.53% | -32.78% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -11.86% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -21.84% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.46% | -2.24% | -22.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.53% | -5.55% | -20.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 4.74% | +3.01% |
Volatility
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China UCITS ETF (CNEW.L) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) at 5.05%. This indicates that CNEW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNEW.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.05% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 10.69% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.60% | 14.07% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 16.47% | +8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 16.84% | +8.40% |
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNEW.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNEW.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNEW.L nor MOAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNEW.L and MOAT.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MOAT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MOAT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L is categorized as China Equities, while MOAT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. CNEW.L tracks MarketGrader New China Screened Index, while MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNEW.L and 0.49% for MOAT.L.
Find the right allocation for CNEW.L and MOAT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer