CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L
CNEW.L (VanEck New China UCITS ETF) and M9SV.L (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNEW.L tracks the MarketGrader New China Screened Index while M9SV.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNEW.L returned 1.29%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for M9SV.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNEW.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for M9SV.L.
Performance
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CNEW.L is traded in USD, while M9SV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the M9SV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNEW.L achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly higher than M9SV.L's -6.81% return.
CNEW.L
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -10.84%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
M9SV.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- 6M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- -6.81%
- 1Y
- -0.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNEW.L VanEck New China UCITS ETF | -6.01% | 23.92% | -0.36% | -9.27% | -28.05% | 6.19% |
M9SV.L Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF | -6.81% | 8.52% | 28.13% | 6.19% | -16.41% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNEW.L and M9SV.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CNEW.L and M9SV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNEW.L
M9SV.L
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China UCITS ETF (CNEW.L) and Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNEW.L | M9SV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.01 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | -0.01 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | -0.01 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNEW.L drawdown since its inception was -46.53%, which is greater than M9SV.L's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNEW.L and M9SV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNEW.L | M9SV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.53% | -30.47% | -16.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -8.65% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -23.59% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.46% | -13.93% | -10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.53% | -9.91% | -16.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 3.34% | +4.41% |
Volatility
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China UCITS ETF (CNEW.L) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L) at 3.12%. This indicates that CNEW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than M9SV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNEW.L | M9SV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 3.12% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 8.39% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.60% | 12.67% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 20.78% | +4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 20.90% | +4.34% |
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNEW.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than M9SV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNEW.L vs. M9SV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNEW.L nor M9SV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNEW.L and M9SV.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L tracks MarketGrader New China Screened Index, while M9SV.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNEW.L and 0.45% for M9SV.L.
Find the right allocation for CNEW.L and M9SV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer