CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L
CNEG.L (Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C)) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CNEG.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. CNEG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.
Performance
CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CNEG.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEUD.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNEG.L
MEUD.L
CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C) (CNEG.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNEG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.45 | — |
Drawdowns
CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNEG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.77% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.90% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility
CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNEG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.15% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.93% | — |
CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNEG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNEG.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CNEG.L.
CNEG.L is categorized as China Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. CNEG.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CNEG.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.
Find the right allocation for CNEG.L and MEUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer