CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L
CNEG.L (Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C)) and CA3S.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - CNEG.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD while CA3S.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNEG.L returned 4.28%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for CA3S.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNEG.L achieves a -8.89% return, which is significantly lower than CA3S.L's 14.81% return.
CNEG.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -8.89%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CA3S.L
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 51.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNEG.L Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C) | -8.89% | 23.90% | 11.58% | -14.99% | 4.39% |
CA3S.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 14.81% | 24.66% | 16.66% | -16.63% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNEG.L and CA3S.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between CNEG.L and CA3S.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNEG.L
CA3S.L
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C) (CNEG.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CA3S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNEG.L | CA3S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.57 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 8.16 | -8.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 23.71 | -23.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNEG.L | CA3S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 3.22 | -3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.45 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNEG.L drawdown since its inception was -46.55%, which is greater than CA3S.L's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNEG.L and CA3S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNEG.L | CA3S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.55% | -35.12% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.54% | -6.23% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.84% | -26.15% | -0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.79% | -1.01% | -21.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -15.51% | -11.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.43% | 2.15% | +8.28% |
Volatility
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C) (CNEG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CA3S.L) at 5.37%. This indicates that CNEG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA3S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNEG.L | CA3S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 5.37% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 10.58% | +4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 15.80% | +4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.48% | 20.98% | +10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.48% | 20.98% | +10.50% |
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CNEG.L and CA3S.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
CNEG.L vs. CA3S.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNEG.L nor CA3S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNEG.L and CA3S.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNEG.L and CA3S.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
CNEG.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while CA3S.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for CNEG.L and CA3S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer