CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L
CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ROLG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNDX.L returned 15.77%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for ROLG.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNDX.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ROLG.L.
Performance
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CNDX.L is traded in USD, while ROLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ROLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CNDX.L having a 15.58% return and ROLG.L slightly higher at 16.13%.
CNDX.L
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 15.58%
- 6M
- 14.84%
- 1Y
- 32.44%
- 3Y*
- 25.89%
- 5Y*
- 15.77%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
ROLG.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -10.18%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 6M
- 14.48%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 15.58% | 19.75% | 26.42% | 56.22% | -33.49% | 27.92% | 48.25% | 37.96% | -17.05% |
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 16.13% | 16.86% | 4.55% | -2.47% | 16.56% | 28.06% | 0.58% | 5.92% | -31.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.L and ROLG.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.17 |
The correlation between CNDX.L and ROLG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNDX.L
ROLG.L
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNDX.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.00 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.18 | 9.24 | +0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum ROLG.L drawdown of -47.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.L and ROLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDX.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -47.02% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -13.82% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.44% | -22.26% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -22.26% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -13.30% | +9.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -17.74% | +12.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.00% | +0.18% |
Volatility
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) at 4.94%. This indicates that CNDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDX.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 4.94% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 14.64% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 16.22% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 22.45% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 22.20% | -2.08% |
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ROLG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNDX.L vs. ROLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNDX.L nor ROLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNDX.L and ROLG.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROLG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROLG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.
CNDX.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ROLG.L is Commodities. CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CNDX.L and 0.28% for ROLG.L.
Find the right allocation for CNDX.L and ROLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer