CNDX.L vs. OEF
CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while OEF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.L returned 21.60%/yr vs 16.50%/yr for OEF. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNDX.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for OEF.
Performance
CNDX.L vs. OEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDX.L achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly higher than OEF's 6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.L has outperformed OEF with an annualized return of 21.60%, while OEF has yielded a comparatively lower 16.50% annualized return.
CNDX.L
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 18.12%
- 1Y
- 35.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.24%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 21.60%
OEF
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
CNDX.L vs. OEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 16.86% | 19.75% | 26.42% | 56.22% | -33.49% | 27.92% | 48.25% | 37.96% | -1.08% | 31.91% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 6.55% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -4.16% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.L and OEF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CNDX.L and OEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDX.L vs. OEF — Risk / Return Rank
CNDX.L
OEF
CNDX.L vs. OEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNDX.L | OEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.19 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 8.97 | +2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNDX.L vs. OEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum OEF drawdown of -54.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.L and OEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDX.L | OEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -54.11% | +18.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -11.06% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.44% | -19.80% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -26.47% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -31.44% | -3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -3.62% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -11.75% | +6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.69% | +0.46% |
Volatility
CNDX.L vs. OEF - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) at 4.58%. This indicates that CNDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDX.L | OEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 4.58% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 10.24% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 13.20% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 17.76% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 18.48% | +1.64% |
CNDX.L vs. OEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than OEF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNDX.L vs. OEF - Dividend Comparison
CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.86% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNDX.L and OEF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.
CNDX.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OEF is Large Cap Blend Equities. CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while OEF tracks S&P 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CNDX.L and 0.20% for OEF.
Find the right allocation for CNDX.L and OEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer