CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. CNDX.L is passively managed, while JEPQ.L is actively managed. Over the past year, CNDX.L returned 39.29% vs 28.73% for JEPQ.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNDX.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.L.

Performance

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDX.L achieves a 19.65% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ.L's 8.75% return.

CNDX.L

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 6.81%
• YTD: 19.65%
• 6M: 18.66%
• 1Y: 39.29%
• 3Y*: 27.98%
• 5Y*: 17.61%
• 10Y*: 21.62%

JEPQ.L

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 8.75%
• 6M: 9.37%
• 1Y: 28.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	19.65%	19.75%	3.15%
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	8.75%	14.77%	2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CNDX.L and JEPQ.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024	0.86

The correlation between CNDX.L and JEPQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNDX.L	JEPQ.L
Technology	57.3%	54.0%
Communication Services	14.5%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	7.1%
Healthcare	3.8%	4.4%
Industrials	2.8%	3.1%
Utilities	1.3%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.0%
Energy	0.5%	0.4%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.2%

Return for Risk

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDX.L

CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

JEPQ.L

JEPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
JEPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
JEPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JEPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
JEPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNDX.L	JEPQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.41	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.46	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.47	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	3.48	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.03	15.39	-2.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDX.L and JEPQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNDX.L	JEPQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.41	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.08	+0.04

Drawdowns

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, which is greater than JEPQ.L's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.L and JEPQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNDX.L	JEPQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.17%	-20.10%	-15.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-8.28%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.84%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-2.77%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	1.87%	+1.20%

Volatility

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) at 1.99%. This indicates that CNDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNDX.L	JEPQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	1.99%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	8.97%	+2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.79%	11.95%	+3.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	15.99%	+4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.07%	15.99%	+4.08%

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDX.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNDX.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison

CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.05%	0.06%	0.03%	0.04%	0.07%	0.06%	0.30%	0.16%	0.16%
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	10.20%	10.06%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNDX.L and JEPQ.L in my portfolio?

CNDX.L and JEPQ.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNDX.L or JEPQ.L?

On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNDX.L or JEPQ.L?

CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.L.

What is the main difference between CNDX.L and JEPQ.L?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CNDX.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.L.