CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CNCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF) and VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CNCL.TO tracks the S&P/TSX 60 while VUN.TO tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CNCL.TO returned 29.00% vs 29.34% for VUN.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNCL.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for VUN.TO.

Performance

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNCL.TO achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than VUN.TO's 12.43% return.

CNCL.TO

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 11.65%
• 1Y: 29.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VUN.TO

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 7.17%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 29.34%
• 3Y*: 23.05%
• 5Y*: 15.50%
• 10Y*: 15.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	9.70%	22.73%	17.93%	4.66%
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF	12.43%	11.43%	33.76%	8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CNCL.TO and VUN.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023	0.53

The correlation between CNCL.TO and VUN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNCL.TO	VUN.TO
Financial Services	37.1%	12.5%
Energy	17.2%	4.2%
Basic Materials	16.5%	2.2%
Technology	8.4%	31.5%
Industrials	8.1%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	5.0%
Utilities	2.7%	2.5%
Communication Services	2.2%	9.7%
Real Estate	0.2%	2.5%
Healthcare	-	10.2%

Return for Risk

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCL.TO

CNCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 79
CNCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
CNCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CNCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CNCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CNCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

VUN.TO

VUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
VUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
VUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNCL.TO	VUN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.47	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	3.39	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.45	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	3.46	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.95	12.96	+4.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNCL.TO and VUN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNCL.TO	VUN.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.47	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	1.01	+0.52

Drawdowns

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.75%, smaller than the maximum VUN.TO drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCL.TO and VUN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCL.TO	VUN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.75%	-28.19%	+14.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.97%	-8.51%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.67%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.39%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-3.80%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	2.27%	-0.65%

Volatility

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) have volatilities of 2.92% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNCL.TO	VUN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	3.04%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	8.81%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.77%	11.97%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.51%	15.43%	-2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.51%	16.70%	-4.19%

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCL.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VUN.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCL.TO vs. VUN.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than VUN.TO's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	8.49%	9.15%	11.88%	6.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF	0.74%	0.84%	0.93%	1.10%	1.21%	0.97%	1.15%	1.45%	1.52%	1.39%	1.49%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNCL.TO and VUN.TO in my portfolio?

CNCL.TO and VUN.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNCL.TO or VUN.TO?

On fees, VUN.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCL.TO or VUN.TO?

VUN.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNCL.TO.

What is the main difference between CNCL.TO and VUN.TO?

CNCL.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60, while VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index CAD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNCL.TO and 0.17% for VUN.TO.