PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO).

CNCC.TO and HSAV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNCC.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60. It was launched on Mar 16, 2011. HSAV.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020.

Performance

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CNCC.TO
Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF		2.33%19.53%14.81%7.07%-4.03%30.41%-4.67%
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF		1.16%2.58%4.24%5.04%2.79%0.66%0.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNCC.TO achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than HSAV.TO's 1.16% return.

CNCC.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
2.33%
6M
7.29%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
8.57%

HSAV.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.69%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF

Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with CNCC.TO:
CNCC.TO vs. XEG.TOCNCC.TO vs. TTP.TOCNCC.TO vs. CDAY.NEOCNCC.TO vs. HXT.TOCNCC.TO vs. CASH.TOCNCC.TO vs. HBNK.TOCNCC.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Often compared with HSAV.TO:
HSAV.TO vs. CASH.TOHSAV.TO vs. ZMMK.TOHSAV.TO vs. CBIL.TOHSAV.TO vs. PSA.TOHSAV.TO vs. SGOVHSAV.TO vs. CSAV.TOHSAV.TO vs. CMR.TO

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF

Return for Risk

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CNCC.TO
CNCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CNCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO
HSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CNCC.TOHSAV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

2.17

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

3.22

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

5.32

-3.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.89

14.57

-3.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNCC.TO and HSAV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CNCC.TOHSAV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.17

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

1.87

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.78

-1.78

Correlation

The correlation between CNCC.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNCC.TO
Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF		7.40%7.59%9.68%10.07%9.93%5.28%5.53%5.33%6.06%5.52%5.24%8.54%
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCC.TO and HSAV.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CNCC.TOHSAV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-2.18%

-36.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-0.59%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

-2.18%

-13.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

0.00%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-0.19%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.22%

+1.68%

Volatility

CNCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Canadian S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.42%. This indicates that CNCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CNCC.TOHSAV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

0.42%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

0.96%

+6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

1.37%

+10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

1.75%

+10.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

1.58%

+13.23%